Uncle Sam’s Gag Orders on Dog Doors…

Will this get me shadow-banned even harder than I already am? Honestly… they should think twice.

Because the moment the private sector is in joint-action (42 U.S.C. § 1983) with the government—working on their behalf providing “compelled compliance or assistance,” conveniently skirting the Constitution through bad actors and no security controls—they don’t get to hide behind the “we’re just a private company, “ and “we can make-up community guidelines as we go” excuses anymore.

Congratulations: they’re now legally responsible for obstructing, blocking, limiting access, and interfering with our First Amendment rights—constitutional birthrights—as they are thoroughly intertwined with FISA, with the distinctions between the two are conveniently collapsed.

Let’s get down to the nitty-gritty.

Anyone here rocking Norton, Lookout (FSecure) “cybersecurity” on their phone or laptop? You might as well cancel. What you’re paying for is not protection—it’s a false sense of security, at least where the government is concerned.

A low-level hacker? Sure they may warn you about them. Otherwise, it acts like a pacifier drenched with NyQuil in a toddler’s mouth, so mommy can drink her wine and watch reality tv.

How do I know?

Because, the FBI agent who lives in Pebble Beach, California, snuck passed both Norton and Lookout without notifying me, whilst infiltrating my devices with malware. In turn, Lookout denied I even had an account with them while Norton and I did not get far enough to discuss.

So, how do these companies get away with marketing services and privacy that they literally cannot—and—do not—provide?

Everyone stands at the podium and swears there are no front or back doors—pinky promise. But then—whoopsie—they quietly signed gag orders and secrecy mandates so they "legally" can’t disclose the betrayals. That’s not lying per se, you see—that’s legal semantics. Very different. Totally respectable.

By way of example and not limitation: tech companies like X, Meta, ChatGPT, Apple and banks, provide our lovely government—hello, FBI, CIA & Homeland Security 👋—with this privacy violating passage that blows the lid into full access.

Although I have not put much thought into Signal or Whatsapp—maybe they can shed light if they provide “compelled compliance or assistance” with FISA?

Apple famously reassured us:

“We have no intention of building a backdoor into our products… If we create a backdoor, there’s no way to guarantee it would only be used by the good guys.”

And they’re right per their—precise—linguistics.

It’s not a backdoor. It’s not a front door. I like to call it... a dog-door. Because no one ever said which doors were off-limits.

Small. Innocent. Barely noticeable. Just big enough to squeeze through—until suddenly it isn’t. Without warning it’s full-blown, looky-loo control center with plausible deniability.

And it’s true, your camera and microphone can be accessed with no green or orange notification light. Best practice is to assume anything with Bluetooth capabilities has the abilitiy to locate you and listen in for those keywords, secrets or your next move.

And yes—before anyone asks—this is all "completely legal" due to their "Longleat Hedge Maze." Almost like a spider web filled layers of laws that overlap and miss eachother. They're essentially blowing holes through the Constitution to slip through the cracks, only to cover their six with executive orders and whatever else they can come up with.

Legal… assuming a warrant. A warrant that exists in theory because it is blankly saved somewhere, pretending to be sent to the FISC courts.

But more often than not.... it is NOT. According to public reporting, one FBI field office alone ran roughly 240,000 unauthorized queries.

So, let’s play dumb for a second. How exactly do you run a search on someone without a warrant?

And if the private sector insists that our govies do not having direct access—excuse me—segmented compelled assistance to comply because the exact verbiage is what they approve or deny—why did they hand over private information without a warrant in the first place?

Interesting.

Let’s pretend there’s an imminent national security threat and they need to look someone up immediately. Sure—we’ll generously assume they already have a FISC warrant in hand.

Now imagine the process involves calling or emailing each company, waiting on hold, navigating a phone tree, and politely asking an operator for permission to “take a quick peek” at the target.

Press 1 for terrorism.
Press 2 for metadata.
Press 3 for human trafficking.

Right? That is definitely how it works.

Absolutely no instantaneous systems already in place to jump on someone’s phone call that very second or input their name to confirm how much money they have in the bank while downloading all the skeletons in their closet in less than a minute.

I can already hear the explanation forming: “We accidentally collected that information. That’s how we were able to search it.”

Oh. Okay. Sure.

Which raises the far more sinister and menacing question: You can collect information without a warrant?

And please—I hope they spare us the Section 702 international collection speech.

As a prime example, I was sitting right there in Monterey, California when my life was accessed, calls were intercepted telling me to “check my breaks” and “you need burial insurance,” while Jeffrey Epstein photos were placed as app icons to scare me into silence—thoroughly infiltrated and efficiently exfiltrated.

But don’t worry—it was probably just an accidental international collection since January 2020 to present day. A very precise, well-documented, repeatable... boo-boo.

Mind you, those 240,000 unauthorized inquiries were from one FBI office. Now imagine the rest of the Bureau. The CIA. How about Homeland Security?

Let's contemplate on how many agents are going through a messy breakup or divorce? How many friends are just “helping a homie out?”

Now combine that level of emotional maturity and low-grade personal vendettas to those who have full-control to high-grade government tech, the most powerful on earth—at least $5 trillion funded by taxpayers—and they want to sit there and tell us nothing weird happens all the time, only every four years or so?

To make it fair, even those at said private sector companies with access to anyone... curiosity never clicked their mouse into someone else’s privacy hole to take a bite of their cheese?

Looks to me like the Inspector General appears to operate on a “trust me, bro” basis as their track records shows a—lack—there—of.

But we should relax and trust the government because “they’re here to help”—there are safeguards.

Invisible safeguards.
Internal safeguards.

Safeguards—I mean audits—that are activated two to four years after the violations, with no one in history to be held accountable in the public eye... EVER.

And what recourse is there when social platforms silence and shadow ban on behalf of the very government that has bound them by gag orders and secrecy mandates—in terms of this dog-door access—with direct connection into our private life... our privacy?

What about the accounts they don’t silence—the ones they quietly prop up, boost and amplify to keep the narrative humming along?

That’s not coincidence.
That’s not community standards.
That’s joint-action entwinement.

Private and public companies acting as enforcement arms for the government, waving away warrants because community standards are apparently stronger than the Constitution, while quietly providing loosey-goosey access for their side pieces.

And now that we know…
They say knowing is the real violation.

The high and mighty, top-tier-level civil rights organizations—such as the American Civil Liberties Union was contacted. My ego didn’t quite have the courage to follow up with the Florida chapter. After all, no answer is an answer.

The ACLU and Electronic Frontier Foundation’s silence suggests there’s little enthusiasm for involving someone with direct experience of FISA abuse—precisely the sort of inconvenient detail that Clapper v. Amnesty famously lacked.

Their decision not to help is, of course, only my assumption—drawn from the unmistakable sound of absolute silence.

Transparency is the answer along with cryptographic controls so our privacy is not violated—these technologies should only be accessed with the FISC pass.

To experience this sort of tresspass, literally kicked me on my ass. My life was torn apart and that isn’t even the start.

This has become my mission even if no one will listen. If anyone made it to the end, thank you for hanging on. For snapshots of the DOJ & FBI’s section in my lawsuit click the “Brief” link on the top of this page.